Skip to content
The Well of Daliath
Menu
Menu

HQ2 – Need some help on framing contests (2012)

Need some help on framing contests Submitted by Sdrolion on Wed, 11/07/2012 – 13:43

Hey, all…I’m used to systems that break things down into turn-by-turn, round-by-round sort of play, and I’ve been trying to gain an understanding of HeroQuest’s structure by working on framing some scenes from earlier games as HeroQuest contests.

I’ve been able to answer a number of my questions thanks to the excellent examples in HQ, but there’s one that is a bit of a bugaboo for me: what do you do when you’ve got a group simple contest, but one player has decided to do something that is also vital, but not part of the goal?

The situation in question: we’ve got a thief, a barbarian, an archer, and a mage. Due to various events involving a smarmy evil wizard, they’re being chased by a horde of crazed, plague-ridden animals. They’ve reached a hidden entrance to a manor and are trying to get inside before they get eaten and/or infected.

Now, in this scene (which was using GURPS), the thief got to work picking the lock, the barbarian and the archer held off the horde, and the mage inspected some runes marking the area around the door to try to find out what was inside the place.

At first, I thought we had three goals here: Hold of the Horde, Get the Door Open, and Gather Information. But I realized that you could really combine the lockpicking and the battle under one goal: Escape the Horde (as long as you’re okay with them still escaping if the lockpicking fails–I’d figure that the guy just had trouble with the lock but the others managed to fight well enough to give him time to succeed). Gather Information can’t be combined, though.

It seems like you’d probably just run that as a Group Simple Contest for the Escape the Horde trio, and then a separate Simple Contest for the mage, but…should there be some disadvantage for the fact that the mage is working on something else? Or is there another way this should be framed? (For instance, technically if the Escape the Horde defenders fail, the mage should be pressed for time too, not just the lockpicker…so is it actually two Group Simple contests, with the barbarian and archer in both?)

(Obviously as a GM you can avoid this situation by just not having Runes of Great Interest show up in the middle of a chase, but I can see situations where it does come up, cinematically…for example, some scenes from Stargate SG-1, where Daniel is trying to understand some archeological element while the rest of the team is doing other things, could theoretically result in this…though they could also be Group Simple Contests to resolve the overall threat, with Archaeology and Combat just tactics towards that, depending on the situation.)

If anyone has any input I would appreciate it. ^_^


Juggle the Framing

Submitted by Philmagpie on Thu, 12/07/2012 – 05:34.

Hi,

I can see a couple of options here;

  • 1    Tinker with the Framing
    • If you Frame the Contest as Escape through the Door with the Knowledge, then it is all rolled together into one simple contest.  
  • 2    Knowledge is Automatic
    • You could resolve the Mage’s actions independent of any contest, by simply considering the level of the relevant knowledge Ability, and then automatically present to the Mage the amount of knowledge that this level would typically convey.
    • You could rule that the Mage would not have the time to study the Runes in depth given the situation, thus losing the opportunity to roll for possibly higher results.
  • 3    Lack of Magical Aid
    • If you wish to penalize the group for the Mage not contributing to the Group Simple Contest, then I would suggest that you simply increase the overall diffculty of the Contest, rather than handing out individual modifiers.  Thus, you would still only need to roll the once and all of the Players are rolling against the same Resistence.
  • I hope that this helps.  I have found HQ to be very flexible, and the GM can mould the narrative to accomodate all sorts of mechanical variations

Phil


Framing a group simple contest

Submitted by Herve on Wed, 11/07/2012 – 14:24.

OK then, I’d say this falls under my “all actions have consequences” mantra. If the wizard doesn’t want to contribute to open the door / hold off the slimy beast, or somehow explain how deciphering the Runes helps in getting the door opened (he recognized a dwarvish writing pattern specific to IFU notices), then he’s off doing his own, individual simple contest, while the others try to get the job done.

First consequence : it’s harder for the other three to reach their goal, add + 3 or +6 to the difficulty level – and make sure the players know it. Let them get the wizard back in line.

Second consequence : if they don’t make it and the slimy creatures get through, the wizard gets attacked at +6 or +9 as he is engrossed in his readings, his back turned toward the hopping horrors. Make sure the player does understand that. Perhaps he’ll change his mind and use his magics to fight off the beasts ?


That’s pretty much what I was

Submitted by Sdrolion on Wed, 11/07/2012 – 14:46.

That’s pretty much what I was starting to figure…if a player wants to do something utterly separate, he’s removing resources from the rest of them, so you just kind of treat it as them having more to deal with? (Could even probably describe it as such in play–regardless of success or failure, you describe another creature jumping them–though on a success, they manage to slay it anyway–where the wizard might have either killed it for them or helped get the door open before the attack happened.)

That seems to make sense in general. The other thing I was thinking was to give the opposition 1 or 2 Resolution Points for each character not participating in the group goal, but is that too harsh? (Basic reasoning was that there’s something that happens that the wizard wasn’t there to stop, or the work goes slower or beasts come quicker, etc.)

To be clear: I don’t regard what the wizard did as problematic–it’s a tactical/story choice I’d like to allow, but I agree there should be consequences that the group should have to consider. Just trying to see what an “appropriate” level of consequence would be.


Ooh, or here’s an option for

Submitted by Sdrolion on Wed, 11/07/2012 – 15:30.

Ooh, or here’s an option for using the difficulties but letting the players adapt a bit: what if we said “if you do this, the group takes a +9 to difficulty overall–but they can divide that in 3s at they see fit?” So if the barbarian and archer are feeling confident, they can claim the entire difficulty increase between them: the barbarian says “While I’m fighting, more creatures surround me” and takes +6, and the archer says “There’s just too many targets to handle alone, and they’re getting closer and closer” and takes +3. By taking those, they prevent the thief from taking any increase. That seems to mesh well with HQ’s “let the players help set the contest” idea.

Related Pages

  • D101 Games – Empires Ending (2013)
  • D101 Games – Empires Rising available in PDF (2012)
  • D101 Games – HeroQuest supplements included in GMs Day sale (2013)
  • HQ2 – 1 mastery equals 10 men (2012)
  • HQ2 – Area effect spells/weapons (2013)
  • HQ2 – Berserk Magic (2013)
  • HQ2 – Community abilities (2013)
  • HQ2 – Compelling Conflicts (2012)
  • HQ2 – Conversion Rules for RQIII to HQ – is there such a thing? (2013)
  • HQ2 – Daka Fal Help (2012)
  • HQ2 – Default resistance (2012)
  • HQ2 – Doing things without skills (2013)
  • HQ2 – Edges from Hero Wars? (2012)
  • HQ2 – Enhance skills (2012)
  • HQ2 – Fantasy Grounds II Ruleset (2012)
  • HQ2 – Grimoires for the Lhankor Mhy? (2013)
  • HQ2 – HeroQuest II FAQ (2012)
  • HQ2 – Keyword and break-out abilities maximum rating (2012)
  • HQ2 – Leverageable Items from RuneQuest 6 to HeroQuest 2 (2012)
  • HQ2 – Lingering Benefits / States of Adversities (2013)
  • HQ2 – Lots of Lingering Penalties (2012
  • HQ2 – Multiple Abilities in Extended Contests (2012)
  • HQ2 – Multiple opponent penalty in group simple contests (2012)
  • HQ2 – New characters in an existing game? (2012)
  • HQ2 – Notes from running an Orlanthi Initiation scenario (2013)
  • HQ2 – Pyrrhic Victory (2012)
  • P:GTA – Doubt about the naming contest in Red Moon Rising (Pavis gateway to adventure)(2012)
  • P:GTA – Formal Scene Structure to Facilitate and Intrigue in Pavis Game: Feedback sought. (2012)
  • Perception in HQ2
  • Resistance for players
  • RQ/HQ Confusion (2012)
  • RQ6 – Book of Quests Now Available for Pre-Order (2013)
  • RQ6 –  Previews (2012)
  • S:KoH – Added Mechanics (2012)
  • S:KoH – Sartar character examples (2013)
  • S:KoH – Wyter Abilities from the Clan Questionnaire in The Colymar Campaign (2012)
  • Sidekick rules
  • Single-Source Superheroes–how best to leverage Heroquest for this genre
  • Something Wicked; other Gateways? (2012)
  • Spell Casting “Cost”
  • Tap? (2012)
  • Tips for Solitary GMing (2012)
  • Too few players in a group
  • Using Heroquest for Horror
  • What HeroQuest Gateway supplements would you like to see? (2012)

2012, HQ2, Old Heroquest Rules Discussions

Page Last updated: 2025-02-25 13:34:07

Sections

  • Search Tips
  • Current RuneQuest Glorantha Publications
  • RuneQuest Glorantha Corrections and Q&A
  • Catalogue
  • References for Glorantha
    • Gloranthan Canon
  • Gloranthan Documents
  • RPG Systems & Versions
  • Gallery
  • About This Site
  • Get involved!

Latest Posts

  • The Grasslands of Prax

    Something to keep in mind about Prax. The grasslands of …
  • Praxian Kinship Groups

    Praxian tribes are divided into smaller kinship groups or clans, …
  • Lunar Resettlement of Tarsh after 1460 ST

    After 1460, large sections of Peloria (especially east of the …
  • The Spread of the Lunar Way

    In the Lunar Provinces, about 26% of the total population …
  • Gods of Fire and Sky and the Lunar Way

    The Gods of Fire and Sky co-exist alongside the Lunar …
  • How Much Land is a Hide?

    So in RQ, a “hide” is a unit of accounting …
  • Agricultural Data for RuneQuest

    Back in the late 70s and early 80s, Greg‘s only …
  • Farming in Dara Happa

    In anticipation of the Fire/Sky Book, here’s a few notes …
  • Farming in the Big Rubble

    There are some 1600 humans in the Big Rubble, with …

Links

  • Chaosium
  • Chaosium’s RuneQuest RPG Wiki
  • Glorantha on BRP Central
  • RuneQuest on BRP Central
  • RuneQuest on Discord
  • Prince of Sartar Webcomic
  • Glorantha G+ Archives on Tapatalk
  • Search mailing list archive

Latest from BRP Central

  • Fillable excel RQG character sheets?
  • Where is there a list of temples in Dragon Pass?
  • New on the Jonstown Compendium: Many Suns
  • control entity spirit spell question
  • spell matrix cost
  • Subcults vs Associated Cults
  • Gorgorma and Dendara's Chess Game
  • Merged deities
  • Elf plant ships and dwarf stone ships
  • Do Dwarves have souls?

Popular Tags

Boldhome (large city) Chaosium Colymar (Sartar tribe) Contents Cult demographics Cults of Runequest (preview) Ernalda Esrolia (homeland) FRA Furthest (large city) G+ post Gods Wall Greg Stafford Guide to Glorantha (preview) Humakt Jar-eel Lunar Empire Lunar Pantheon Magazine Malkioni pantheon Map Michael O’Brien Mongoose MRQ1 New Pavis (small city) Old Glorantha Q&A Orlanth Orlanthi pantheon Photo reference Population demographics Prax (homeland) RQ3 RQG Sandy Petersen Sartar (homeland) Spirit Cult Star Subcult Tapatalk post Tarsh (homeland & Lunar province) Troll Pantheon Yelm Yelmalio Yelm Pantheon Youtube

Recently added or updated

  • Spirit Magic by Cult and Associate Cult

  • ISS1102 Glorantha: Introduction to the Hero Wars (2000)

  • Dragon Pass – A brief outline (2013)

  • Some Fronelan Population And Cultural Details

  • Notes on Fronela III

  • Notes on Fronela II

  • Notes on Fronela I

  • Hon-eel Temples and Shrine

  • Seven Mothers Temples and Shrines

  • Ernalda Temples and Shrines

  • Barntar Temples and Shrines

  • Babeester Gor Temple and Shrines

  • Voria Shrines

  • Ty Kora Tek Temples and Shrines

  • Asrelia Temples and Shrines

  • Maran Gor Temple, Shrines and Site

  • Odayla Shrines

  • Humakt Temples, Shrines and Sites

  • Orlanth Rex Temples, Shrines and Sites

  • Hippoi Shrines

©2025 The Well of Daliath | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme